Overview of Search and Seizure Law

Search and Seizure What is search and seizure law? And how can you tell that you need to contact a Fairfax, VA criminal defense attorney? Read on to learn more about protecting your privacy against unwarranted intrusion.

Understanding Search and Seizure Law

According to the 4th Amendment of the US constitution, the law places limits of the authority to search people, search property, make arrests, and/or seize contraband such as weapons and illegal drugs. Essentially, these limits form the bedrock of search and seizure law. Our blog, Do I Have To Let The Police Search My Car? also has some useful tips.

There are a number of things you need to know to better understand this law. The best way to go about doing this is by talking to a Fairfax, VA criminal defense attorney. Additionally, consider reading this short guide to improve your knowledge.

Protecting Your Privacy

The search and seizure provisions of the Fourth Amendment are designed to protect your privacy. As such, this amendment protects you against unreasonable search and seizure by federal and/or state law enforcement authorities. Your Fairfax, VA criminal defense lawyer will also use this amendment to protect you.

However, this is not without exceptions. In fact, the amendment permits reasonable searches and seizures. This means that law enforcement might override your concerns for privacy and search you, your home, property, or documents if:

  • They have probable cause that leads them to believe that they can uncover evidence of a crime you committed, and they have a court warrant for such a search
  • The circumstances justify a search without the issue of a search warrant
  • To this end, the Fourth Amendment does not provide exclusive protection. As your attorney will inform you, this law will only protect people who have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the thing or place to be searched.
Legitimate Expectations of Privacy

A court of law will generally use a 2-part test to determine whether the defendant had legitimate expectations of privacy when the search was conducted. This test includes:

  • If the person actually expected some level of privacy
  • Are these expectations objective and reasonable? Can society recognize these expectations?

Search and Seizure
However, if you are stopped by an officer and they notice you have weapons on the passenger’s seat of your car, then no search has been performed. This is because even if you considered the passenger’s seat to be private, society would not extend the protections of privacy to this location.
To this end, if you use a public restroom, you expect not to be spied on. This means that you expect privacy. Most people (judges included) would consider such an expectation to be objective and reasonable. Therefore, installing hidden video cams by the authorities in restrooms can be considered to be a search and would fall subject to the requirements of reasonableness.

However, if you are stopped by an officer and they notice you have weapons on the passenger’s seat of your car, then no search has been performed. This is because even if you considered the passenger’s seat to be private, society would not extend the protections of privacy to this location. In this case, there would be no objectively reasonable expectation of privacy with regards to those weapons since they were in plain view.

Private Security Personnel

At times, private security personnel outnumber the police. As a direct result, you are more likely to deal with these personnel than with the police in housing projects, office buildings, pharmacies, and supermarkets.

To this end, you need to understand that the Fourth Amendment and its provisions do not apply to the searches that are conducted by these non-governmental employees. This is precisely because they do not act on behalf of the government.

For instance, if you are searched by a security guard at a mall and they find illegal drugs in your backpack, the guard might detain you, call the authorities, and turn you in. In such a case, the drugs would be admissible as evidence in a court of law.

Fourth Amendment Violations

So, what would happen when the search and seizure violated the FourthAmendment? And how would your criminal defense attorney protect you?

a) Exclusionary Rule

Essentially, if a court of law finds that the search was unreasonable, then the evidence that was seized will not be used directly against the defendant in the case. This principle is today referred to as the exclusionary rule.

b) Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

According to this doctrine, not only will such evidence be inadmissible, so too will all additional evidence derived from that initial findings.

Contact The Law Office of Wilfred W. Yeargan Today

There is a lot more to learn about search and seizure law. In case you feel like your rights to privacy were violated and your property seized illegally, contact The Law Office of Wilfred W. Yeargan—your Fairfax, VA criminal defense attorney today by giving us a call or sending us a message online. We will help you understand your rights and provide you with the protection you need.

Testimonials
★★★★★
"I would like to take this time to thank you for the diligence with which you dealt with my case. Your professionalism and hard work exceeded my expectations. As a Combat Veteran in our Nation’s Armed Forces you handled my case with the utmost sincerity and resolve. Again, thank you and best of luck in future cases."
★★★★★
"Mr. Yeargan handled my court date swiftly and efficiently with friendly, knowledgeable advice. His efforts produced very pleasing results." A.L.
★★★★★
"Attorney Yeargan “successfully resolved my case as quickly as possible…I would like to thank you very much for your excellent service." H.N.
CONTACT US
Call Now For A Free Consultation 703.352.9044